<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More examples of &#8220;prix fixe&#8221; in French competition&#8230; mobile phone co.&#8217;s fined $631 million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethisphere.com/more-examples-of-prix-fixe-in-french-competition-mobile-phone-cos-fined-631-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/more-examples-of-prix-fixe-in-french-competition-mobile-phone-cos-fined-631-million/</link>
	<description>Essential reading for Directors, CEOs and General Counsel who see opportunity in ethical leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:26:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spooner</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/more-examples-of-prix-fixe-in-french-competition-mobile-phone-cos-fined-631-million/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Spooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/more-examples-of-prix-fixe-in-french-competition-mobile-phone-cos-fined-631-million/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>It brings up an interesting point about the importance of appearances and the dangers of industry benchmarking which is often done by companies surveying their nearest competitors. Not only &#039;signalling&#039; behavior as a soft form of collusion can be done under the guise of information exchange, but also some bona-fide benchmarking may not appear so innocent to regulators. It underscores the importance of training staff on do&#039;s and dont&#039;s of industry benchmarking or, better still, outsourcing the benchmarking to an independent third party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It brings up an interesting point about the importance of appearances and the dangers of industry benchmarking which is often done by companies surveying their nearest competitors. Not only &#8216;signalling&#8217; behavior as a soft form of collusion can be done under the guise of information exchange, but also some bona-fide benchmarking may not appear so innocent to regulators. It underscores the importance of training staff on do&#8217;s and dont&#8217;s of industry benchmarking or, better still, outsourcing the benchmarking to an independent third party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

