<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ethisphere™ Institute &#187; Profitable Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethisphere.com/category/blog/profitable-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethisphere.com</link>
	<description>Essential reading for Directors, CEOs and General Counsel who see opportunity in ethical leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Boeing and Airbus Work to Improve Airline Industry CO2 Levels</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/boeing-and-airbus-work-to-improve-airline-industry-co2-levels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/boeing-and-airbus-work-to-improve-airline-industry-co2-levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment Health & Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethisphere Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[must_read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/boeing-and-airbus-work-to-improve-airline-industry-co2-levels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though the two transatlantic rivals may be bitterly fighting for the rights to a U.S. government contract, Boeing and Airbus do see eye-to-eye on one critical issue: cutting the carbon dioxide emissions from their planes. Both companies are aggressively working towards developing more fuel-efficient planes to add to their fleets, according to a report by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphere.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/airplane.jpg" alt="airplane" width="110" />Though the two transatlantic rivals may be bitterly fighting for the rights to a <a href="http://www.forbes.com/home/2008/04/20/pentagon-washington-defense-biz-cx_bw_0421pentagon.html">U.S. government contract</a>, Boeing and Airbus do see eye-to-eye on one critical issue: cutting the carbon dioxide emissions from their planes.  Both companies are aggressively working towards developing <span id="more-4286"></span>more fuel-efficient planes to add to their fleets, according to a report by the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/04/22/ccboeing22.xml">Telegraph Newspaper</a>.  The article acknowledges that the airline industry is the &#8220;whipping boy&#8221; of environmentalists &#8211; despite the fact that aviation-based CO2 emissions are a mere one-sixth of auto emissions &#8211; and Boeing and Airbus don&#8217;t want to take it any longer.</p>
<p>This June, Boeing will be showing off its new 787 Dreamliner plane.  The Dreamliner will be 20 percent more fuel efficient than the majority of airplanes, and is designed in part to increase the number of direct flights between mid-sized cities.  The idea here is that reduced layovers will mean fewer take-offs and landings, both of which use more fuel than when the plane is airborne.  Airbus has its own plane in the works, though that isn&#8217;t expected to be on the market until 2013, a full five years after Boeing&#8217;s rival model flies.</p>
<p>And with the rising cost of oil, using less jet fuel saves these two companies some serious green.  Now if only the auto companies would follow suit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/boeing-and-airbus-work-to-improve-airline-industry-co2-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>H&amp;M Stops Selling Australian Wool</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/hm-stops-selling-australian-wool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/hm-stops-selling-australian-wool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment Health & Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethisphere Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[must_read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/hm-stops-selling-australian-wool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H&#038;M is the second largest retailer in Europe and has stores around the world, and now it no longer accepts wool from Australia. This came about after the Australian wool industry showed signs of hesitation on its plan to stop mulesing sheep by 2010. Though H&#038;M admittedly uses only a &#8220;very small selection of merino [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphere.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/sheep.jpg" alt="sheep" width="125" />H&#038;M is the second largest retailer in Europe and has stores around the world, and now it no longer accepts wool from Australia.   This came about after the Australian wool industry showed signs of hesitation on its plan to stop mulesing sheep by 2010.  Though H&#038;M admittedly uses only a &#8220;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUSL1866119320080218">very small selection of merino wool</a>&#8220;, the type of wool that comes from mulesed sheep, and an H&#038;M spokesperson said the <span id="more-3990"></span>company wants &#8220;to take a stand to promote animal welfare.&#8221;</p>
<p>For those unfamiliar with mulesing, it&#8217;s named after John Mules &#8211; the first to &#8220;accidentally&#8221; develop the practice &#8211; and involves cutting off pieces of wrinkle skin from around the rear of a sheep to prevent flystrike.  Flystrike leads to infection and eventually death, however mulesing is extremely painful and often done with little or no painkillers for the sheep.  Enter PETA.</p>
<p>PETA heavily fought the practice, commonplace in Australia, and reached a tentative cease-fire with the <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2007_June_30/ai_n19329517">nation&#8217;s wool industry (AWI) last summer</a> (the Australian Wool Industry agreed to stop mulesing, and PETA had to agree to &#8220;conduct itself within the law&#8221;).  It appears that the AWI is now <a href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23223395-2,00.html">reneging on its promise</a>, and PETA is again up in arms.</p>
<p>Many retailers have already stopped importing wool from Australia because of the practice.  Sweden-based H&#038;M is the latest of them, saying, &#8220;H&#038;M does not accept mulesing. The company has decided to direct its buying towards other countries of origin and other suppliers in Australia that can guarantee mulesing-free merino wool.&#8221;  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/hm-stops-selling-australian-wool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifth Annual &#8216;Climate Disclosure Leadership Index&#8217; Released Today</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/fifth-annual-climate-disclosure-leadership-index-released-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/fifth-annual-climate-disclosure-leadership-index-released-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Health & Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/fifth-annual-climate-disclosure-leadership-index-released-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[London based Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), a non-profit organization dedicated to increasing awareness on global climate change, released their annual Climate Disclosure Leadership Index (CDLI) today. The list, compiled from responses to a questionnaire CDP sent to over 2400 companies worldwide, compares FT 500 companies in each sector on how transparent they are on regarding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/icecaps.thumbnail.jpg" alt="icecaps.jpg" height="112" width="149" />London based <a href="http://www.cdproject.net/">Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP)</a>, a non-profit organization dedicated to increasing awareness on global climate change, released their <a href="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/cdp5_ft500_summary_report.pdf">annual Climate Disclosure Leadership Index (CDLI) today</a>.</p>
<p>The list, compiled from responses to a questionnaire CDP sent to over 2400 companies worldwide, compares FT 500 companies in each sector on how transparent they are on regarding their climate change practices.</p>
<p>Institutional investors worth over $41 trillion, known as &#8220;signatory investors&#8221;, including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and HSBC put their name on <a href="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/cdp5_letter_and_questionnaire.pdf">CDP&#8217;s questionnaire</a>.  The 315 signatory investors will use the resulting information to &#8220;assess the potential risks and opportunities relating to climate change&#8221; from participants in order to better advise clients on how to invest.</p>
<p>Participation in the questionnaire was voluntary, and the results are &#8220;self-reported, largely non-verified responses,&#8221; according to today&#8217;s published report.</p>
<p>Companies that made the list include Hewlett-Packard, Citigroup and Coca-Cola.</p>
<p>The Carbon Disclosure Project was founded in 2000 by CEO Paul Dickinson. The CDP began publishing its Climate Disclosure Leadership Index in 2003.</p>
<p><font size="1"><u><strong>Commentary</strong></u>: Seven of the 68 companies on the CDLI were also listed in <a href="http://ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/">Ethisphere&#8217;s 2007 World&#8217;s Most Ethical Companies Ranking</a>:</font></p>
<ul>        <font size="1"></p>
<li>Baxter International</li>
<li>Marks &amp; Spencer</li>
<li>Unilever</li>
<li>Alcoa</li>
<li>HSBC</li>
<li>Suncor Energy</li>
<li>Sun Microsystems</li>
<p></font></ul>
<p><font size="1">Fifteen signatory investors were on the list as well.  Since they obviously weren&#8217;t excluded from participating, and taking into consideration the fact they helped develop the questionnaire, it&#8217;s worth asking: why didn&#8217;t ALL the signatory investors make the cut?</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/fifth-annual-climate-disclosure-leadership-index-released-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observer Newspaper Announces Top 20 Ethical Firms in FTSE 350</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/observer-newspaper-announces-top-20-ethical-firms-in-ftse-350/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/observer-newspaper-announces-top-20-ethical-firms-in-ftse-350/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International/FCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/observer-newspaper-announces-top-20-ethical-firms-in-ftse-350/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, The Observer&#8217;s Good Companies Guide unveiled its list of the UK&#8217;s top 20 firms in the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 350 index, based on social, environmental and corporate governance criteria. The little-known Speedy Hire, an equipment rental company, made the top spot on the list for what The Observer described as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/unionjackbusinesspeople.thumbnail.jpg" alt="unionjackbusinesspeople.jpg" height="128" width="85" />Earlier this week, The Observer&#8217;s Good Companies Guide unveiled its list of the UK&#8217;s top 20 firms in the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 350 index, based on social, environmental and corporate governance criteria.  The little-known Speedy Hire, an equipment rental company,  made the top spot on the list for what The Observer described as &#8220;a no-nonsense approach that included jargon-free corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speedy Hire is a relatively small company compared to most on the list, such as retailing superstore Marks &amp; Spencer and Vodafone, the international mobile phone giant (Vodafone owns a 45% minority stake of Verizon Wireless in the U.S.).</p>
<p>The Observer points out that judging ethical standards is a subjective measure.  However, they emphasize that companies without a &#8220;sustainable strategy&#8221; to deal with ethical risks will inevitably endure financial setbacks.</p>
<p>You can read the entire article as well as judge the list for yourself by heading over to <a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,2156206,00.html">The Observer</a>.</p>
<p><font size="1"><u><strong>Commentary</strong></u>: Although listed as the number 1 most ethical company in the UK, there&#8217;s no mention of the distinction on Speedy Hire&#8217;s &#8216;Awards &amp; Recognition&#8217; or &#8216;History&#8217; sections of their <a href="http://www.speedyhire.co.uk/">website</a>.  This is compared to oilfield service company Expro, which made 19th on the list and displays the recognition clearly on their <a href="http://www.exprogroup.com/index.php?option=com_frontpage&amp;Itemid=1">homepage</a> (which has a very cool introductory video).  It&#8217;s unclear whether Speedy Hire forgot to acknowledge the kudos  altogether or decided to humbly continue with business as usual.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/observer-newspaper-announces-top-20-ethical-firms-in-ftse-350/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motley Fool features Sun Microsystems&#8217; ethics &amp; Ethisphere Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/motley-fool-features-sun-microsystems-ethics-ethisphere-magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/motley-fool-features-sun-microsystems-ethics-ethisphere-magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governance Boards & CEOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/motley-fool-features-sun-microsystems-ethics-ethisphere-magazine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The extremely popular investment website, the Motley Fool, just ran a large profile about the positive ethics and governance of Sun Microsystems. This piece ran on the heels of a much-better-than-expected earning report. To excerpt&#8230; The company just reported stellar earnings, befitting its astronomical business name, wherein management bragged a little bit about its community [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/wme-ranking2.thumbnail.jpg" alt="wme-ranking2.jpg" /> The extremely popular investment website, the Motley Fool, <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/07/31/all-aboard-sun-microsystems.aspx?terms=ethisphere&amp;vstest=search_042607_linkdefault">just ran a large profile about the positive ethics and governance</a> of Sun Microsystems.  This piece ran on the heels of a much-better-than-expected earning report.  To excerpt&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>The company just reported stellar earnings, befitting its astronomical business name, wherein management bragged a little bit about its community reputation. <em> Ethisphere </em> recently named Sun one of the <a href="http://ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/" target="_blank">most ethical companies in the world</a> and showcased Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz as a leader in ethical business leadership, so I thought it timely to have a look at the boardroom, too&#8230;.</p>
<p>The company comes across as personable and transparent, from the open-source board involvement, through the executive blogs, to the shields-down takeover defenses. Word on the street is that the corporate culture matches this openness, and that management has the trust of its employees. Speaking as a former Sun admin myself, this attitude is a far cry from the downtrodden worldview of only a few years ago, and it seems like this is the way Sun was always <em> supposed </em> to act but never quite could. Carry on, ladies and gentlemen.</p></blockquote>
<p>What&#8217;s the lesson here?  Good ethics is not just about attracting better employees&#8230; it also attracts media attention and investors too.   Check the piece out for yourself <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/07/31/all-aboard-sun-microsystems.aspx?terms=ethisphere&amp;vstest=search_042607_linkdefault">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/motley-fool-features-sun-microsystems-ethics-ethisphere-magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xerox announces &#8220;greener paper&#8221; that uses less resources/weighs less</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/xerox-announces-greener-paper-that-uses-less-resourcesweighs-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/xerox-announces-greener-paper-that-uses-less-resourcesweighs-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Health & Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/xerox-announces-greener-paper-that-uses-less-resourcesweighs-less/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With great fanfare yesterday, Xerox Corporation unveiled a first-of-its-kind paper for digital printing that uses half as many trees as traditional paper, while lowering the cost to mail printed material. At the core of the development are Xerox&#8217;s technical achievements, which have increased the amount of a tree that can be used (doubling the yield [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/tree-hugger-3.thumbnail.jpg" alt="tree-hugger-3.jpg" />With great fanfare yesterday, Xerox Corporation unveiled a first-of-its-kind paper for digital printing that uses half as many trees as traditional paper, while lowering the cost to mail printed material.</p>
<p>At the core of the development are Xerox&#8217;s technical achievements, which have increased the amount of a tree that can be used (doubling the yield per tree from 45% to 90%) and used less water and chemicals in production (resulting in reduced energy use and emissions by up to 75%).  And finally, as the paper is materially lighter in weight, it costs less to transport (and uses less energy along the way).</p>
<p>The downside to the paper, however, is that it does not age as well as normal paper, turning yellow over time.</p>
<p><strong><font size="1"><u>Commentary:</u></font></strong><font size="1"> This is an excellent example of aligning business innovation with environmental responsibility for greater profit (in keeping with Ethisphere&#8217;s slogan <strong>GOOD. SMART. BUSINESS. PROFIT.</strong>).   </font></p>
<p><font size="1">Due to the &#8220;yellowing&#8221; issue, however, there will be limits to how widely this paper will be used (do you really want all of your documents to turn yellow?).  As Xerox itself points out, the core market for this <strike>yellower</strike> greener paper will be in paper printouts which are not intended to have a long shelf-life (such as invoices, statements, direct mail pieces, manuals, catalogs and brochures). </font></p>
<p><font size="1">Xerox appears to be stepping up its sustainability and resource commitments across the board.  Less than two weeks ago on July 19th, the <a href="http://www.greenbiz.com/news/news_third.cfm?NewsID=35467">company also announced that it was joining</a> the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP),  increasing the total membership of the group to 31 corporations representing nearly $2 trillion in revenues.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/xerox-announces-greener-paper-that-uses-less-resourcesweighs-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney stamping out smoking in films</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/disney-stamping-out-smoking-in-films/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/disney-stamping-out-smoking-in-films/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/disney-stamping-out-smoking-in-films/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disney has announced a plan to become the first Hollywood studio to eliminate cigarette smoking in its movies. The announcement was made via a letter written on Disney letterhead to U.S. Congressman Edward Markey of Massachusetts, who serves as chairman of the House subcommittee on telecommunications and the internet. Read the letter here. In the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/cruella-smoking.thumbnail.jpg" alt="cruella-smoking.jpg" /> Disney has announced a plan to become the first Hollywood studio to eliminate cigarette smoking in its movies.  The announcement was made via a <a href="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-admin/subcommittee%20on%20telecommunications%20and%20the%20internet">letter written on Disney letterhead to U.S. Congressman Edward Markey</a> of Massachusetts, who serves as chairman of the House subcommittee on telecommunications and the internet.  Read the letter <a href="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/iger-disney-letter-to-markey-072507.pdf" title="iger-disney-letter-to-markey-072507.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>In the letter, Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger insisted that smoking in Disney-branded films would be &#8220;non-existent&#8221; in the future.</p>
<p><u><strong><font size="1">Commentary:</font></strong></u><font size="1"> Before everyone raises Disney on some throne, a dose of skepticism may be in order, as smoking has never been so rife as in such movies as The Princess Diaries, the Shaggy Dog, and the Santa Clause.  Furthermore, Iger makes no commitments regarding all the other titles and studios under Disney&#8217;s control, such as Miramax and Touchstone.  And finally, the timing of this note is a little suspicious as it came just weeks after the Motion Picture Association of America, responsible for the film ratings system, said it would consider smoking alongside other factors, such as violence or sexual content, when rating a film.</font></p>
<p><font size="1">So, while we like Disney overall, Iger might have been better off not trumpeting Disney&#8217;s position through letters and media interviews. </font></p>
<p><font size="1"> Meanwhile, poor Hallmark studios (which <em>does</em> make movies for older audiences)  <a href="http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=3011&amp;Itemid=141">hopped on the bandwagon</a> just two days after Disney&#8217;s letter&#8230; and got ZERO press for it.  </font></p>
<p><font size="1">We now know who has a better PR firm.  :)</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/disney-stamping-out-smoking-in-films/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cadbury announces aggressive emissions-reduction plan</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/cadbury-announces-aggressive-emissions-reduction-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/cadbury-announces-aggressive-emissions-reduction-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Health & Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/cadbury-announces-aggressive-emissions-reduction-plan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cadbury Schweppes has announced a plan to cut its net &#8220;absolute&#8221; carbon emissions. In doing so, it is promoting itself as the first UK food manufacturer to commit to using &#8220;absolute&#8221; measures in fighting climate change. By 2020, the confectionery company intends to slash half of its net absolute carbon emissions, with at least 30 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/cadbury-logo.thumbnail.jpg" alt="cadbury-logo.jpg" /> Cadbury Schweppes has announced a plan to cut its net &#8220;absolute&#8221; carbon emissions.  In doing so, it is promoting itself as the first UK food manufacturer to commit to using &#8220;absolute&#8221; measures in fighting climate change.</p>
<p>By 2020, the confectionery company intends to slash half of its net absolute carbon emissions, with at least 30 percent a result of internal actions.</p>
<p>&#8220;We recognize that if we are serious about tackling climate change, we need to be &#8216;absolutely&#8217; committed,&#8221; said Cadbury Schweppes CEO Todd Stitzer in a statement. &#8220;This means re-thinking the way we do business, embedding sustainability into every decision we take.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cadbury Schweppes also plans a 10 percent reduction in packaging per ton of product in addition to a gradual shift to using up to 60 percent biodegradable packaging.</p>
<p><u><font size="1"><strong>Commentary:</strong></font></u><font size="1">  Many people in the U.S. are not familiar with the term &#8220;absolute net&#8221; when it comes to carbon offsetting (most are more focused simply on purchasing carbon offset credits, as opposed to actual reduction in carbon generation at the source). The Cadbury &#8220;absolute net&#8221; effort focuses first on minimizing energy use through efficiency improvements, switching to more environmentally energy forms, and then, only as as a last resort, purchasing offsets such as sponsoring the planting of carbon-neutralizing trees, etc.</font></p>
<p><font size="1">What we particularly like about Cadbury&#8217;s environmental strategy is that they have given the initiative its own brand:<strong><em> &#8220;Purple Goes Green.&#8221;</em></strong> We have found that &#8220;branded&#8221; initiatives are easier to understand by employees, generally allow for greater buy-in and acceptance/participation, and also demonstrate greater commitment to the initiative by company leadership as well as the organization as a whole.  Kudos to Cadbury!</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/cadbury-announces-aggressive-emissions-reduction-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs report: ethical corporations outperform others in long run</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/goldman-sachs-report-ethical-corporations-outperform-others-in-long-run/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/goldman-sachs-report-ethical-corporations-outperform-others-in-long-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Codes of Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning Moment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[must_read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/goldman-sachs-report-ethical-corporations-outperform-others-in-long-run/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent United Nations meeting on responsible business called attention to a company&#8217;s ethical performance as an important consideration for investors deciding which companies to back. Citing findings from a recent survey by Goldman Sachs, Ling asserted that companies with strong ethical standards outperform the market. For example, companies on an ethical list compiled by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8Q6HQ8O0.htm">United Nations meeting on responsible business</a> called attention to a company&#8217;s ethical performance as an important consideration for investors deciding which companies to back.</p>
<p>Citing findings from a recent <a href="http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/summit2007/gs_esg_embargoed_until030707pdf.pdf">survey by Goldman Sachs</a>, Ling asserted that companies with strong ethical standards outperform the market.  For example, companies on an ethical list compiled by Goldman Sachs outperformed the MSCI World Index by an average of 25 percent.  72 percent of these companies were also found to have outperformed their industry peers.</p>
<p>Anthony Ling of Goldman Sachs International insisted that a company&#8217;s &#8220;ESG&#8221; performance (its environmental, social, and corporate governance) can provide an advantage to the company over competitors because these factors are sure to pay off with customers and employees.</p>
<p>Ling stated that these factors, combined with careful consideration of the company&#8217;s place in its industry, competitive advantage, and financial performance should all be taken into account when evaluating investment options in mature or emerging markets.</p>
<p><u><strong><font size="1">Commentary:</font></strong></u><font size="1"> We were thrilled to see this report.  Our research at Ethisphere has found similar results.  The Ethisphere Ethics Index, which tracks the publicly traded components of the annual World&#8217;s Most Ethical Companies Ranking, OUTPERFORMED THE S&amp;P BY MORE THAN 2:1 over the five-year period that ended March 31, 2007. </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/goldman-sachs-report-ethical-corporations-outperform-others-in-long-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethisphere featured in Wall Street Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/ethisphere-featured-in-wall-street-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/ethisphere-featured-in-wall-street-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[must_read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/ethisphere-featured-in-wall-street-journal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ethisphere and its &#8220;World&#8217;s Most Ethical&#8221; rankings were recently featured in the world&#8217;s leading business publication, the Wall Street Journal. Columnist Phred Dvorak called attention to Ethisphere and its partial founder, Corpedia, as providing viable measures of a company&#8217;s governance standards and practices. The article went on to highlight the importance of corporate governance to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/wsj.thumbnail.jpg" alt="wsj" />Ethisphere and its &#8220;World&#8217;s Most Ethical&#8221; rankings were recently featured in the world&#8217;s leading business publication, the Wall Street Journal. Columnist Phred Dvorak called attention to Ethisphere and its partial founder, Corpedia, as providing viable measures of a company&#8217;s governance standards and practices.</p>
<p>The article went on to highlight the importance of corporate governance to a company&#8217;s success, reinforcing Ethisphere&#8217;s long-held idea that more ethically strong companies outperform the less ethical (the article even highlighted our reasoning by pointing out that the 65 companies on our &#8220;World&#8217;s Most Ethical&#8221; list outperformed the S&amp;P over the past five years).</p>
<p>And while the article cites a few different (and sometimes conflicting) measures along with Ethisphere for rating a company&#8217;s corporate citizenship, it sends a clear message for those who might still wonder if stock market behavior is any reflection of a company&#8217;s ethical reputation.  Dvorak&#8217;s answer to this? A resounding <strong><em>YES</em></strong>.</p>
<p>Click <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118332860213454548-search.html?KEYWORDS=corpedia&amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month">here</a> to see the full article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/ethisphere-featured-in-wall-street-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McDonald&#8217;s getting greener, London&#8217;s doobie-toking bike messagers doomed to perpetual munchies</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/mcdonalds-getting-greener-londons-doobie-toking-bike-messagers-doomed-to-perpetual-munchies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/mcdonalds-getting-greener-londons-doobie-toking-bike-messagers-doomed-to-perpetual-munchies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Health & Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ridiculous/Odd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/mcdonalds-getting-greener-londons-doobie-toking-bike-messagers-doomed-to-perpetual-munchies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McDonald&#8217;s, in one of its latest announcements centering around more eco-friendly practices, announced last week that it will start converting its cooking oil into biodiesel. The intention is to run all of its 155 UK delivery trucks on biodiesel made entirely from cooking oil collected from its restaurants by the end of this year. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> McDonald&#8217;s, in <a href="http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/01072007/399/mcdonald-39-s-power-trucks-cooking-oil.html">one of its latest announcements</a> centering around more eco-friendly practices, announced last week that it will start converting its cooking oil into biodiesel. The intention is to run all of its 155 UK delivery trucks on biodiesel made entirely from cooking oil collected from its restaurants by the end of this year.</p>
<p>The fast-food group, which to date has been running trucks on 95 percent diesel and five percent biodiesel, will initially use a blend of 85 percent biodiesel and 15 percent rapeseed oil.</p>
<p>The company said the net effect of the plan would be a 78 percent reduction in its carbon emissions.</p>
<p>The move is yet another effort by the group to overhaul its environmental image. A year ago, after a sustained campaign by Greenpeace, McDonald&#8217;s agreed to stop using soya from newly deforested land in the Amazon rainforest. This year, it started selling coffee certified by the Rainforest Alliance in its UK restaurants &#8211; a move that it says boosted sales by 10 percent.</p>
<p><u><font size="1"><strong>Commentary</strong>: </font></u><font size="1"> Sorry about the doobie comment &#8211; but seriously, there have been numerous instances when we have been passed by bike messengers in New York City and London that are simply &#8216;pot on wheels&#8217; as the smell lingers for several blocks.</font></p>
<p><font size="1">Anyhow, McDonald&#8217;s continues to show innovation in sustainability &#8211; and the PR that surrounds it. However, can you imagine how hungry everyone is going to be from McDonald&#8217;s trucks burning cooking oil as exhaust all day long around London? Hmmm&#8230;. perhaps we smell a devious marketing plan here to increase french fry sales across the city through subliminal marketing. </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/mcdonalds-getting-greener-londons-doobie-toking-bike-messagers-doomed-to-perpetual-munchies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Employees 2x as likely to stay at ethical companies</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/report-employees-2x-as-likely-to-stay-at-ethical-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/report-employees-2x-as-likely-to-stay-at-ethical-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Codes of Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/report-employees-2x-as-likely-to-stay-at-ethical-companies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a recent study by Kenexa Research Institute, having an ethically conscious culture can have a direct and positive affect on almost all aspects of an employee&#8217;s impression of their workplace. More importantly, those who work in an organization with strong ethical cultures are nearly twice as likely to say they plan on remaining [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a recent <a href="<a href="http://members.ethisphere.com/file_download/280"">study by Kenexa Research Institute</a>, having an ethically conscious culture can have a direct and positive affect on almost all aspects of an employee&#8217;s impression of their workplace. More importantly, those who work in an organization with strong ethical cultures are nearly twice as likely to say they plan on remaining with their firms as are those who work in less ethical cultures.</p>
<p>The report, based on results gathered from a survey of 10,000 U.S. workers, showed the impact that working in a strong ethical culture can have on an employee&#8217;s pride in an organization, confidence in its future, and overall satisfaction.  </p>
<p>The most surprising finding? Just over half of those polled rated their organization positively in providing an ethical culture- only 29 percent actually reported that their employers have an ethically strong culture. </p>
<p><font size="1"><strong><u>Commentary</u>:</strong> Naturally, we are not surprised with the report, as the ability to attract and retain workforce talent is one of the &#8220;profit points&#8221; behind Ethisphere&#8217;s &#8220;Good. Smart. Business. Profit.&#8221; motto.  Of course, it&#8217;s always nice to see reaffirming data. This can prove extremely useful for internal compliance and ethics officers looking for additional support for their program efforts.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/report-employees-2x-as-likely-to-stay-at-ethical-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starbursts too chewy?  What lawyer bothers to take this on?&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/starbursts-too-chewy-what-lawyer-bothers-to-take-this-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/starbursts-too-chewy-what-lawyer-bothers-to-take-this-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ridiculous/Odd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace/Customer Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/starbursts-too-chewy-what-lawyer-bothers-to-take-this-on/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On what must have been a slow news day in Detroit, FoxNews is reporting about a Michigan woman who is suing Starbursts&#8217; parent company, Mars Inc. for more than $25,000 for &#8220;permanent personal injuries&#8221; she claims she sustained after biting into one of their yellow candies in 2005. The &#8220;victim&#8221;, Victoria McArthur of Romero, Mich., [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/starburst1.thumbnail.jpg" alt="starburst1.jpg" /> On what must have  been a slow news day in Detroit, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,287022,00.html">FoxNews is reporting</a> about a Michigan woman who is suing Starbursts&#8217; parent company, Mars Inc. for more than $25,000 for &#8220;permanent personal injuries&#8221; she claims she sustained after biting into one of their yellow candies in 2005.</p>
<p>The &#8220;victim&#8221;, Victoria McArthur of Romero, Mich., says that Starbursts should come with a warning label and that she does not want to see someone else suffer like her.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t want to see anybody else have to go through what I have gone through from eating a piece of candy that was supposed to be soft chew&#8221; she said.</p>
<p><strong><font size="1"><u>Commentary:</u></font></strong><font size="1"> Dear Ms. McArthur: Some other warnings for you&#8230; Jolly Ranchers are hard; there are no men inside of a package of Three Musketeers; and despite their lack of obvious warning labels, knives are indeed sharp. </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/starbursts-too-chewy-what-lawyer-bothers-to-take-this-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAE Systems to stop selling weapons to unethical countries&#8230;wah?</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/bae-systems-to-stop-selling-weapons-to-unethical-countrieswah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/bae-systems-to-stop-selling-weapons-to-unethical-countrieswah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust & Business Practices (Global)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International/FCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/bae-systems-to-stop-selling-weapons-to-unethical-countrieswah/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BAE Systems, the British defense company has decided to blacklist a fifth of the world&#8217;s countries as part of moves to help guarantee ethical conduct and to comply with anticorruption laws. This comes on the heels of investigations by the US DOJ over allegations that it paid huge bribes to win business in Saudi Arabia. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/just-say-no-reagan.thumbnail.jpg" alt="just-say-no-reagan.jpg" />BAE Systems, the British defense company has decided to blacklist a fifth of the world&#8217;s countries as part of moves to help guarantee ethical conduct and to comply with anticorruption laws.  This comes on the heels of investigations by the US DOJ over allegations that it paid huge bribes to win business in Saudi Arabia.</p>
<p>BAE refuses to name the countries it has blacklisted, but analysts suspect that it includes some former are thought to include some Commonwealth members and former customers. Defence analysts believe that these include Nigeria and Indonesia, both of which have bought Hawk jets from BAE.</p>
<p>As Mike Rouse, group marketing director <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/engineering/article1963960.ece">said to the Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We used to be everywhere, but now we operate in about 30 per cent of countries. Some countries we don&#8217;t do business with because they are too small to buy our equipment and others are politically sensitive, like China.</p>
<p>As the group marketing director, Make Rouse, said to &#8220;There are about 15 to 20 per cent of countries where <strong><em>we just say &#8216;no&#8217;.</em></strong> We take calls from them all the time, but we just cannot do business there. Everybody that operates in this market today has to be compliant with the laws and regulations.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><u><font size="1">Commentary:</font></u></strong><font size="1"> While they may not be popular, military hardware providers are an important part of the global economy and we support the right of any business to pursue its profit.   However, this announcement still sounded a bit goofy in some ways.  We would have been more impressed if they had named the countries.</font></p>
<p><font size="1">Considering there are 245 official countries in the world, this would imply nearly 50 exclusions.  Hmmm&#8230;here are some of our guesses to fill out what must be a big list after China, Cuba and North Korea&#8230;  let&#8217;s see perhaps Togo, Tonga, Luxembourg, Christmas Island, and Barbados.  </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/bae-systems-to-stop-selling-weapons-to-unethical-countrieswah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McDonald&#8217;s to use Shrek to market &#8220;green&#8221; (healthy) foods&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/mcdonalds-to-use-shrek-to-market-green-healthy-foods/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/mcdonalds-to-use-shrek-to-market-green-healthy-foods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/mcdonalds-to-use-shrek-to-market-green-healthy-foods/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McDonald&#8217;s has decided to use its Shrek movie tie-in to feature healthier food items. Shrek will be featured on its salads, milk, apple slices and other products introduced in the last three years as the burger chain tries to combat mounting criticism that its food is contributing to the obesity epidemic in both kids and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/shrek.thumbnail.jpg" alt="shrek.jpg" />McDonald&#8217;s has decided to use its Shrek movie tie-in to feature healthier food items.  Shrek will be featured on its salads, milk, apple slices and other products introduced in the last three years as the burger chain tries to combat mounting criticism that its food is contributing to the obesity epidemic in both kids and adults in the United States.</p>
<p><u><strong><font size="1">Commentary:</font></strong></u><font size="1"> Another good move by McDonald&#8217;s in its push to demonstrate profitable ethical leadership that differentiates itself from the competition.  Who better to market green foods that a green person (and one that is a heck of a lot more interesting that the old Green Jolly Giant). </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/mcdonalds-to-use-shrek-to-market-green-healthy-foods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart announces solar power investment for California and Hawaii stores&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/wal-mart-announces-solar-power-investment-for-california-and-hawaii-stores/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethisphere.com/wal-mart-announces-solar-power-investment-for-california-and-hawaii-stores/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Health & Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profitable Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/wal-mart-announces-solar-power-investment-for-california-and-hawaii-stores/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. announced a purchase of solar power from three solar power providers, BP Solar, SunEdison, and PowerLight, a subsidiary of SunPower Corporation, for 22 combined Wal-Mart stores. The total solar power production from the stores is estimated at 20 million kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, possibly becoming one of the world&#8217;s top-10 solar power [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethisphereblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/solar-panel.thumbnail.jpg" alt="solar-panel.jpg" />Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. announced a purchase of solar power from three solar power providers, BP Solar, SunEdison, and PowerLight, a subsidiary of SunPower Corporation, for 22 combined Wal-Mart stores.</p>
<p>The total solar power production from the stores is estimated at 20 million kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, possibly becoming one of the world&#8217;s top-10 solar power initiatives in the U.S. when fully implemented.</p>
<p>Wal-Mart will use the power generated by the solar panels onsite at each store and will also keep the Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) the units produce, which is unique among most solar power purchases.  Enabling Wal-Mart to maintain ownership of the RECs and its stores&#8217; environmental benefits is another important factor in allowing Wal-Mart to reach its goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy.</p>
<p><u><strong><font size="1">Commentary:</font></strong></u><font size="1"> Such a purchase had by Wal-Mart had already been rumored back in January when <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-11395_3-6146851.html">reports of a RFP being issued by Wal-Mart along these lines hit the media</a>.   From RFP to purchase in several months&#8230; grass does not grow under Wal-Mart&#8217;s feet (lame pun intended).</font></p>
<p><font size="1">On a separate note, we know that Wal-Mart has made selling energy-efficient lightbulbs to consumers part of its &#8220;green strategy&#8221;.  Who knows? &#8211; maybe a day will come a day when consumers will be able to walk in to a Wal-Mart and purchase solar panels </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethisphere.com/wal-mart-announces-solar-power-investment-for-california-and-hawaii-stores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

