<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 World&#8217;s Most Ethical Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/</link>
	<description>Essential reading for Directors, CEOs and General Counsel who see opportunity in ethical leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quitting Cold Turkey &#124; Baby Gooroo</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-14263</link>
		<dc:creator>Quitting Cold Turkey &#124; Baby Gooroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-14263</guid>
		<description>[...] Smokers who don’t want to quit will be free to get their fix elsewhere. I’m sure some will fret about the paternalistic nature of the company’s decision. (“Why pick on Marlboros and not Moon Pies?” they may ask. “Obesity is also a problem.”) But it seems to me like this health-promoting decision is completely in keeping with the nature of a company that has been recognized as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies by Ethisphere Magazine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Smokers who don’t want to quit will be free to get their fix elsewhere. I’m sure some will fret about the paternalistic nature of the company’s decision. (“Why pick on Marlboros and not Moon Pies?” they may ask. “Obesity is also a problem.”) But it seems to me like this health-promoting decision is completely in keeping with the nature of a company that has been recognized as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies by Ethisphere Magazine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Wachovia is the top unethical mortgage company &amp; the government doesn&#039;t seem to want to do anything about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wachovia is the top unethical mortgage company &amp; the government doesn&#8217;t seem to want to do anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>WAAAA WAAAA WAAAA whining bunch of women!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAAAA WAAAA WAAAA whining bunch of women!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>General Electric is not an ethical business. From their pollution of the
Hudson River, to pay offs of Civil Engineers to avoid the multi-billion
dollar clean up, to the Pittsfield Maine PCB contamination which lead to them &quot;buying&quot; and being the ONLY owner of a building in a certain Industrial Park, to firing people with drug and alcohol addictions that utilized their &quot;Benefits&quot; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;and it goes on and on.  I have seen the mark up of their products.  It is simply sick.  I personally made a part which in any average shop, that could make the same exact part, would cost maybe 400$,  GE&#039;s price, are you ready...$4,400!!!!!!!!!  Sick
They talk the talk but don&#039;t you know the rest........ Everything is a fake facade. Sick, Sick,Sick  
And for any of the people who may have a connection to their Power Generating equipment, I sincerely pity you.  Shop around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>General Electric is not an ethical business. From their pollution of the<br />
Hudson River, to pay offs of Civil Engineers to avoid the multi-billion<br />
dollar clean up, to the Pittsfield Maine PCB contamination which lead to them &#8220;buying&#8221; and being the ONLY owner of a building in a certain Industrial Park, to firing people with drug and alcohol addictions that utilized their &#8220;Benefits&#8221; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;and it goes on and on.  I have seen the mark up of their products.  It is simply sick.  I personally made a part which in any average shop, that could make the same exact part, would cost maybe 400$,  GE&#8217;s price, are you ready&#8230;$4,400!!!!!!!!!  Sick<br />
They talk the talk but don&#8217;t you know the rest&#8230;&#8230;.. Everything is a fake facade. Sick, Sick,Sick<br />
And for any of the people who may have a connection to their Power Generating equipment, I sincerely pity you.  Shop around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>John Deere Landscapes layed me off in the middle of workmans comp case.  Any others out there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Deere Landscapes layed me off in the middle of workmans comp case.  Any others out there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe D.</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>This is the most horrible and inaccurate piece of research I have seen in the ethical realm. I&#039;m appalled. And I have no words. Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most horrible and inaccurate piece of research I have seen in the ethical realm. I&#8217;m appalled. And I have no words. Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe D.</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>I am absolutely appalled at this feature...this list is extremely inaccurate. I have no words for how wrong it is. Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am absolutely appalled at this feature&#8230;this list is extremely inaccurate. I have no words for how wrong it is. Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manoj</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>manoj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>hmm. i see some major tobacco companies missing here that will go right up there with Nike and Shell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm. i see some major tobacco companies missing here that will go right up there with Nike and Shell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 23:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>You are kidding right? 
Alcoa? Nike? 
Who bought you out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are kidding right?<br />
Alcoa? Nike?<br />
Who bought you out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Childs</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Childs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Let me invite you to a Tyson Foods poultry farm where you can examine 20 years of their non-negotiable contracts and view photographs of their conduct on our farms.  Real ethics is determined by what you do when no one is watching, not by what is done on the public stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me invite you to a Tyson Foods poultry farm where you can examine 20 years of their non-negotiable contracts and view photographs of their conduct on our farms.  Real ethics is determined by what you do when no one is watching, not by what is done on the public stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethicist</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>ethicist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>It is unfortunate that many of the critics of Wegman&#039;s, Alcoa, GE, Nike and the like simply do not seem capable of balancing the needs of the world&#039;s economies with business realities.  No one company will weather a perfect storm of economic performance pressures from stakeholders, and societal needs and interests.  It is impossible to cite all the factors that weigh in to the decisions being made, but one thing is clear: one man&#039;s trash is another&#039;s treasure, and it&#039;s how you can turn adverse business conditions into good social impact that really counts.  I think that Ethisphere has done a remarkable job in sorting through the trash to find the treasures in a huge heap of self promotion, recognizing them for what they are.  While I don&#039;t condone sweatshops, or environmental irresponsibility, those organizations that go beyond the local legal minimums to ensure localized positive social impact should be recognized. Flawed methodology?  Maybe.  But to err is human.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is unfortunate that many of the critics of Wegman&#8217;s, Alcoa, GE, Nike and the like simply do not seem capable of balancing the needs of the world&#8217;s economies with business realities.  No one company will weather a perfect storm of economic performance pressures from stakeholders, and societal needs and interests.  It is impossible to cite all the factors that weigh in to the decisions being made, but one thing is clear: one man&#8217;s trash is another&#8217;s treasure, and it&#8217;s how you can turn adverse business conditions into good social impact that really counts.  I think that Ethisphere has done a remarkable job in sorting through the trash to find the treasures in a huge heap of self promotion, recognizing them for what they are.  While I don&#8217;t condone sweatshops, or environmental irresponsibility, those organizations that go beyond the local legal minimums to ensure localized positive social impact should be recognized. Flawed methodology?  Maybe.  But to err is human.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley Hallihan</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley Hallihan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 04:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Your naming Baxter makes me question your research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your naming Baxter makes me question your research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregR</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>GregR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see Google on here.  Seems in conflict with the results of a report from Privacy International that named Google at the bottom of the barrel and described them as being &quot;hostile to privacy&quot;.  Doesn&#039;t sound too ethical to me...  (details for those interested: privacyinternational.org)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see Google on here.  Seems in conflict with the results of a report from Privacy International that named Google at the bottom of the barrel and described them as being &#8220;hostile to privacy&#8221;.  Doesn&#8217;t sound too ethical to me&#8230;  (details for those interested: privacyinternational.org)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>If you work on the premise that only multinationals, which is what this list seems to be comprised of, were considered for the &quot;Worlds Most Ethical Companies&quot; then maybe their picks make sense.  Hate to generalize, but having worked in an international acccounting firm and currently working at one of the largest insurance companies in the world, I can say with confidence that ethics initiatives in large corporations are implemented only to the extent necessary for Executive Management to tell everyone they are &quot;serious about ethics&quot;.  So, on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the highest rating), maybe the winners listed above WERE the outstanding companies with solid ratings of 2.  My friends, we live in bad times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you work on the premise that only multinationals, which is what this list seems to be comprised of, were considered for the &#8220;Worlds Most Ethical Companies&#8221; then maybe their picks make sense.  Hate to generalize, but having worked in an international acccounting firm and currently working at one of the largest insurance companies in the world, I can say with confidence that ethics initiatives in large corporations are implemented only to the extent necessary for Executive Management to tell everyone they are &#8220;serious about ethics&#8221;.  So, on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the highest rating), maybe the winners listed above WERE the outstanding companies with solid ratings of 2.  My friends, we live in bad times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna g</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>anna g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 13:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>please send me a list of the companies included in your research, and details on the winners of the &quot;apparel&quot; section.

or a link to where i can find all the information on the web

thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please send me a list of the companies included in your research, and details on the winners of the &#8220;apparel&#8221; section.</p>
<p>or a link to where i can find all the information on the web</p>
<p>thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>To me ethical is ethical if you are not ethical for all things then clearly you are not ethical. Looking at these comments it seem that this is a PR stunt that has no postion in ethics. Cant you here the expression of upset these comments pose. clearly your research is flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me ethical is ethical if you are not ethical for all things then clearly you are not ethical. Looking at these comments it seem that this is a PR stunt that has no postion in ethics. Cant you here the expression of upset these comments pose. clearly your research is flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethisphere.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Official Ethisphere Response to Mitch Gold:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The substance of your thinking about ethics is clearly faulty. Those identifying global standards to achieve Sustainability, and Corporate Social Responsibility encourage the use of Triple Bottom Line Accounting (as a minimum) and generally includes the aspects of the Four Eâ€™s = Economics, Energy (efficiency), Ethics (Equity), and Education. Your models do not consider the MDGâ€™s, the UN Global Compact, or the Earth Charter as principled documents. Where is the ethics in that?
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mitch Gold, homeplanet.org
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Ethisphere Response: In actuality, the WME CSR and Citizenship analysis does take into account Triple Bottom Line adoption, GRI Reporting Guidelines use, adherence to ISO14001, SA8000, involvement with the UN Global Compact, World Business Council for Sustainable Development and World Economic Forum. In fact, we go beyond memberships, certifications and the Davos speeches and look into a host of other criteria including environmental protection record, local community involvement, product innovation that contributes to public well-being, supplier diversity and supplier conduct, etc.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Official Ethisphere Response to Mitch Gold:</p>
<p>The substance of your thinking about ethics is clearly faulty. Those identifying global standards to achieve Sustainability, and Corporate Social Responsibility encourage the use of Triple Bottom Line Accounting (as a minimum) and generally includes the aspects of the Four Eâ€™s = Economics, Energy (efficiency), Ethics (Equity), and Education. Your models do not consider the MDGâ€™s, the UN Global Compact, or the Earth Charter as principled documents. Where is the ethics in that?</p>
<p>Mitch Gold, homeplanet.org</p>
<p><strong>Ethisphere Response: In actuality, the WME CSR and Citizenship analysis does take into account Triple Bottom Line adoption, GRI Reporting Guidelines use, adherence to ISO14001, SA8000, involvement with the UN Global Compact, World Business Council for Sustainable Development and World Economic Forum. In fact, we go beyond memberships, certifications and the Davos speeches and look into a host of other criteria including environmental protection record, local community involvement, product innovation that contributes to public well-being, supplier diversity and supplier conduct, etc.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethisphere.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethisphere.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Official Ethisphere Response to Andrew Kay:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thereâ€™s clearly some limit on company size here (either a priori or as a result of the method used) â€” I find it hard to believe that there arenâ€™t millions of tiny companies more ethical than all of these. Therefore it is important to know which companies were in the original 5000 and therefore deemed â€œless ethical,â€ rather than just â€œnot considered.â€ &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Andrew Kay
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Ethisphere Response: The issue with small companies is that many of them are private and therefore less visible or transparent. Many small companies were not considered for this reason, as we could not obtain adequate information about them to validate our methodology.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Official Ethisphere Response to Andrew Kay:</p>
<p>Thereâ€™s clearly some limit on company size here (either a priori or as a result of the method used) â€” I find it hard to believe that there arenâ€™t millions of tiny companies more ethical than all of these. Therefore it is important to know which companies were in the original 5000 and therefore deemed â€œless ethical,â€ rather than just â€œnot considered.â€ </p>
<p>Andrew Kay</p>
<p><strong>Ethisphere Response: The issue with small companies is that many of them are private and therefore less visible or transparent. Many small companies were not considered for this reason, as we could not obtain adequate information about them to validate our methodology.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon mantrom</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>shannon mantrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>As an independent for Arbonne Int&#039;l., I am disappointed our company did not make your list. Arbonne is an American-based skincare/health &amp; wellness company owned by Harvest Partners, the same private-equity firm that owns Whole Foods, which, wonderfully, DID make your list. Arbonne is a 27-year-old company featuring Swiss-formulated products that have always been manufactured in Irvine, CA. 

Our CEO, Bob Henry, who joined the company in 2004, won the Ernst &amp; Young award &quot;Entrepreneur of the Year&quot; in 2005. Our president, Rita Davenport, who has been with Arbonne since 1990, is in the  American Television Broadcasters Hall of Fame for her previous career as a television interviewer/personality in Phoenix.

The above attributes are all well and good, but the true beauty behind Arbonne is the great heart of this company. Yes, Arbonne is a Network Marketing company, much in the same vein as Avon or Amway, but I have come to find the company&#039;s ongoing training programs, compensation plan, and bonus/rewards program are unparalled in this industry, possibly in ANY industry.

Just last February, Arbonne and its consultants raised $250K for Rita&#039;s favorite charity, Sojourner House in Phoenix, a battered women&#039;s shelter which offers both refuge and job training.

In today&#039;s uncertain marketplace of dwindling 401Ks, non-existent pensions, and major downsizing, Arbonne offers people hope for their futures. Thousands of women and men have changed their lives for the better because of their affiliation with Arbonne. Those previously living paycheck to paycheck and/or drowning in debt, have realized financial freedom and greater financial security through Arbonne.

The compensation plan also includes a white Mercedes for those who reach the Regional Vice-President level. There are over 200 Arbonne white Mercedes in Oklahoma alone! Quite a nice trophy for hard work and determination.
 
To quote Rita Davenport: &quot;Arbonne is a personal development company wrapped around a personal skincare, health &amp; wellness company.&quot;

All these perks would mean nothing, however, without Arbonne&#039;s extreme integrity and ethical stance towards its product formulations. Our company motto &quot;Pure. Safe. Beneficial.&quot; could not be more accurate. You will find no animal by-products or mineral oil (a near-toxic preservative) in Arbonne&#039;s products. All our products are based on botanical formulations. Arbonne has never tested on animals, even before it became cachet not to do so.

So, for next year&#039;s &quot;Most Ethical Companies&quot; list, I feel strongly you should look into Arbonne. Not only do our products work (the anti-aging line is unparalled), but we are growing at the unheard of average rate of about 112% per year! And we&#039;re doing it by leading the pack in sheer excellence in all your areas of criteria.

Note: I am not with the corporate office or some hired hand to promote Arbonne. I am simply an independent consultant who, like so many others, have hope again in my life because a complete stranger offered to share this wonderful company with me. That stranger is now my sponsor and together we will build a networking team that benefits everyone who grabs the &quot;Gift of Arbonne&quot; and runs with it.

Thank you for allowing my comments. For more info. on Arbonne, I suggest going to the website at http://www.arbonne.com. Click on the &#039;Arbonne = REsults&#039; button to get a quick overview of the company: its products and its people.

Sincerely, 
Shannon Mantrom
Independent Consultant
Plano, TX
(972) 693-0954</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an independent for Arbonne Int&#8217;l., I am disappointed our company did not make your list. Arbonne is an American-based skincare/health &amp; wellness company owned by Harvest Partners, the same private-equity firm that owns Whole Foods, which, wonderfully, DID make your list. Arbonne is a 27-year-old company featuring Swiss-formulated products that have always been manufactured in Irvine, CA. </p>
<p>Our CEO, Bob Henry, who joined the company in 2004, won the Ernst &amp; Young award &#8220;Entrepreneur of the Year&#8221; in 2005. Our president, Rita Davenport, who has been with Arbonne since 1990, is in the  American Television Broadcasters Hall of Fame for her previous career as a television interviewer/personality in Phoenix.</p>
<p>The above attributes are all well and good, but the true beauty behind Arbonne is the great heart of this company. Yes, Arbonne is a Network Marketing company, much in the same vein as Avon or Amway, but I have come to find the company&#8217;s ongoing training programs, compensation plan, and bonus/rewards program are unparalled in this industry, possibly in ANY industry.</p>
<p>Just last February, Arbonne and its consultants raised $250K for Rita&#8217;s favorite charity, Sojourner House in Phoenix, a battered women&#8217;s shelter which offers both refuge and job training.</p>
<p>In today&#8217;s uncertain marketplace of dwindling 401Ks, non-existent pensions, and major downsizing, Arbonne offers people hope for their futures. Thousands of women and men have changed their lives for the better because of their affiliation with Arbonne. Those previously living paycheck to paycheck and/or drowning in debt, have realized financial freedom and greater financial security through Arbonne.</p>
<p>The compensation plan also includes a white Mercedes for those who reach the Regional Vice-President level. There are over 200 Arbonne white Mercedes in Oklahoma alone! Quite a nice trophy for hard work and determination.</p>
<p>To quote Rita Davenport: &#8220;Arbonne is a personal development company wrapped around a personal skincare, health &amp; wellness company.&#8221;</p>
<p>All these perks would mean nothing, however, without Arbonne&#8217;s extreme integrity and ethical stance towards its product formulations. Our company motto &#8220;Pure. Safe. Beneficial.&#8221; could not be more accurate. You will find no animal by-products or mineral oil (a near-toxic preservative) in Arbonne&#8217;s products. All our products are based on botanical formulations. Arbonne has never tested on animals, even before it became cachet not to do so.</p>
<p>So, for next year&#8217;s &#8220;Most Ethical Companies&#8221; list, I feel strongly you should look into Arbonne. Not only do our products work (the anti-aging line is unparalled), but we are growing at the unheard of average rate of about 112% per year! And we&#8217;re doing it by leading the pack in sheer excellence in all your areas of criteria.</p>
<p>Note: I am not with the corporate office or some hired hand to promote Arbonne. I am simply an independent consultant who, like so many others, have hope again in my life because a complete stranger offered to share this wonderful company with me. That stranger is now my sponsor and together we will build a networking team that benefits everyone who grabs the &#8220;Gift of Arbonne&#8221; and runs with it.</p>
<p>Thank you for allowing my comments. For more info. on Arbonne, I suggest going to the website at <a href="http://www.arbonne.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.arbonne.com</a>. Click on the &#8216;Arbonne = REsults&#8217; button to get a quick overview of the company: its products and its people.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Shannon Mantrom<br />
Independent Consultant<br />
Plano, TX<br />
(972) 693-0954</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I guess you feel &quot;business as usual&quot; , translate unethical practices now constitute fair corporate policy?  I&#039;ve personally worked for 2 of the above companies and believe me, their dirtier than the scum they suck on.  Your list is as good as garbage and you obviously have been easily swayed to write this puff piece for the usual greasing the PR wheel. You make me sick.  Especially for putting this an &#039;ethical news&#039; website, to give it a semblance of dignity.  Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you feel &#8220;business as usual&#8221; , translate unethical practices now constitute fair corporate policy?  I&#8217;ve personally worked for 2 of the above companies and believe me, their dirtier than the scum they suck on.  Your list is as good as garbage and you obviously have been easily swayed to write this puff piece for the usual greasing the PR wheel. You make me sick.  Especially for putting this an &#8216;ethical news&#8217; website, to give it a semblance of dignity.  Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie Hasad</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie Hasad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Please check your facts before you write a comment.  Wegmans has commented on its handling of the birds:  http://www.wegmans.com/meb/columns/032605.asp.  It sounds like they are willing to go the extra step to ensure reasonable handling of the birds.
Perhaps people should be also lobbying the federal government to have standards for how egg-laying hens are treated.  According to http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/05/05/18211371.php, there aren&#039;t any, and Wegmans brought in an un-paid veterinarian as well as a paid expert professor from the University of California at Davis to receive advice.
Also, for instance, take a look at Wegmans Angus beef which has no hormones from birth, no antibiotics from birth, and environmentally friendly grazing. (http://www.wegmans.com/kitchen/ingredients/meat/byfga.asp).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please check your facts before you write a comment.  Wegmans has commented on its handling of the birds:  <a href="http://www.wegmans.com/meb/columns/032605.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.wegmans.com/meb/columns/032605.asp</a>.  It sounds like they are willing to go the extra step to ensure reasonable handling of the birds.<br />
Perhaps people should be also lobbying the federal government to have standards for how egg-laying hens are treated.  According to <a href="http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/05/05/18211371.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/05/05/18211371.php</a>, there aren&#8217;t any, and Wegmans brought in an un-paid veterinarian as well as a paid expert professor from the University of California at Davis to receive advice.<br />
Also, for instance, take a look at Wegmans Angus beef which has no hormones from birth, no antibiotics from birth, and environmentally friendly grazing. (<a href="http://www.wegmans.com/kitchen/ingredients/meat/byfga.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.wegmans.com/kitchen/ingredients/meat/byfga.asp</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil Rai</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil Rai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>GE?? come on!! the most unethical company there is. Maybe not to the customers but surely to its channel partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GE?? come on!! the most unethical company there is. Maybe not to the customers but surely to its channel partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rives</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got Royal Dutch/Shell on your list??!!  A company that got the Nigerian government to hang Ken Sarawiwa and seven other people for protesting what Royal Dutch/Shell was doing in Nigeria -- especially to the indigenous Ogoni people (taking out oil and giving the people no compensation for it; polluting the entire Niger Delta, so the Ogoni couldn&#039;t grow crops anymore; etc.)  That, to you, is an ETHICAL COMPANY?!  Are you completely out of your minds??!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got Royal Dutch/Shell on your list??!!  A company that got the Nigerian government to hang Ken Sarawiwa and seven other people for protesting what Royal Dutch/Shell was doing in Nigeria &#8212; especially to the indigenous Ogoni people (taking out oil and giving the people no compensation for it; polluting the entire Niger Delta, so the Ogoni couldn&#8217;t grow crops anymore; etc.)  That, to you, is an ETHICAL COMPANY?!  Are you completely out of your minds??!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Who put this list together? Are you sure you are not missing an &quot;un&quot; in the title?

I mean, Nike?? Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who put this list together? Are you sure you are not missing an &#8220;un&#8221; in the title?</p>
<p>I mean, Nike?? Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gail witkowski</title>
		<link>http://www.ethisphere.com/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>gail witkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethisphere.com/2007/05/23/2007-worlds-most-ethical-companies/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>please be ethical yourselves: REMOVE WEGMANS FROM YOUR LIST.
WEGMANS IS NOT ETHICAL TO ANIMALS... THEY HAVE NOT RESOLVED THE ISSUE OF THEIR EGG PRODUCTION FACILITY BEING CRUEL TO CHICKENS....IT IS DISTURBING AND DISGUSTING AND I CAN NO LONGER EAT ANY DAIRY PRODUCTS BECAUSE OF WHAT I READ AND SAW. PPPLLLEEEAAASSSEEE INVESTIGATE AND REPORT THIS ON YOUR SITE. ITS OK TO TAKE IT BACK!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please be ethical yourselves: REMOVE WEGMANS FROM YOUR LIST.<br />
WEGMANS IS NOT ETHICAL TO ANIMALS&#8230; THEY HAVE NOT RESOLVED THE ISSUE OF THEIR EGG PRODUCTION FACILITY BEING CRUEL TO CHICKENS&#8230;.IT IS DISTURBING AND DISGUSTING AND I CAN NO LONGER EAT ANY DAIRY PRODUCTS BECAUSE OF WHAT I READ AND SAW. PPPLLLEEEAAASSSEEE INVESTIGATE AND REPORT THIS ON YOUR SITE. ITS OK TO TAKE IT BACK!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

